Skip to main content

Five strategies to optimize your feed efficiency

Submitted by klampert on Wed, 07/27/2016 - 10:53

Annual profitability is almost always decided in the long, hot months of summer. As cattle try to beat the summer temperatures and still gain efficiently, the bottom line for producers is at stake. Take a look at these tips to ensure you are optimizing your feed efficiency for the second half of 2016.

1. Define “efficiency” appropriately

Choosing an exact and agreed upon definition for “efficiency” among producers is never easy. Should an efficient operation simply focus on increasing the output of carcass weight compared to days on feed? Or should metrics, such as overall cost of gain, feed conversion ratio or overall feed costs, play a more significant role in determining true profitability?  

Though there will be disagreement among producers, there are two appropriate features constant in defining an efficient operation. The first is determining what exactly is the total sum of inputs needed to drive a specific output, and if that could be done better (the most basic definition of efficiency). Unfortunately, many of these may be unseen or unknown by a producer, such as more efficient management techniques, new technologies to implement or unforeseen environmental concerns, among many others.

The second part of an efficient operation is to ensure that current practices promote a viable and profitable system for the foreseeable future. Producing “efficiently” with diminishing returns in the long run only hurts the industry as a whole.

2. Use technology to manage your diet

Using technology to promote efficiency is a constantly growing opportunity for producers. At Alltech, recent developments in regard to in vitro fermentation have yielded encouraging news. The Alltech® In Vitro Fermentation Model (IFM) is a diagnostic tool that simulates rumen fermentation and evaluates the nutritional value of a total mixed ration in terms of digestibility and end products of fermentation.

Recently, demonstrations have been done using IFM to test the nutritive quality of pasture grasses in Florida. Test samples of grass were sent to the Alltech IFM lab in Brookings, South Dakota, and were tested both with and without the Alltech® Feed Efficiency technology, Fibrozyme®. Fibrozyme is a unique hemicellulose-degrading enzyme that enhances the rate of digestion in the rumen of beef cattle. The enzyme technology in Fibrozyme holds the key to unlocking challenges associated with fiber digestibility.

Functionally, what the IFM shows is that, when used in a ration, Fibrozyme can immediately begin breaking down the cell wall fraction of plant fiber in the rumen environment. This quick action jump-starts fiber digestion by providing bacteria with both easily available nutrients and easier access to other plant structures. These types of technologies and feeding models can help producers drive efficiency for their operations.

3. Know what lies ahead

2017 will be marked as a year of major changes in the beef industry. On Jan. 1, 2017, the Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD) will be implemented in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration to apply veterinary oversight to a broad range of products used in animal feed, such as antibiotics. The VFD will be implemented to promote the judicious use of antibiotics in an effort to safeguard public health by limiting the development of antibiotic resistance. This will restrict any antibiotic use for growth promotion or feed efficiency. Once the changes are in full effect, it will be illegal to use medically important antibiotics without a veterinary prescription and they will only be available for use to prevent, control or treat a specifically identified disease.

This is important to efficiency because, as cattle are placed either in feedlots or on pasture-based programs, certain technologies during their feeding cycle may be removed and their diet will change. These changes could affect efficiency in a negative way. Producers need to plan ahead and begin to look at alternative production methods that promote profitable efficiency in line with the VFD regulations.

4. Get more for your efforts

Efficiency doesn’t just mean getting the most from your cattle; it also means finding markets and opportunities that help you get the highest return on your investment. Be selective in choosing the best suppliers and accreditations. Know the expected return on investment and aggressively pursue these premiums for your cattle.  Remember, feed represents up to 70 percent of your operations costs — make the most out of every dollar you spend.

Alltech recently partnered with Where Food Comes From, the parent company of IMI Global, and became their first Feed Verified partner. Fifteen Alltech technologies were verified through this program for clear, direct use in all verified natural, antibiotic-free, Non-Hormone Treated Cattle (NHTC), GAP certified and Non-GMO Project Verified programs. Producers using these technologies can now efficiently benefit from the premiums found from supplying cattle to the European Union or other specialty markets.

5. Continue to ask around!

Lastly, but certainly not least, continue to look around and ask questions on how production can be done better, especially in the hot summer heat when cattle stress is at its highest. At Alltech, we are taking these challenges head-on through a series of informative, free webinars for producers. Listen to a recording of our most recent webinar here, which focused on:

  • Understanding how to spot the signs of heat stress in beef cattle.
  • Learning how nutrition can impact heat stress.
  • Implementing strategies to manage heat stress.
  • Improving overall cattle performance.

For more information on these strategies, contact your Alltech representative or visit www.alltech.com/beef.

 

I want to learn more about nutrition for my beef cattle.

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Hubspot
<!--[if lte IE 8]>
<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2-legacy.js"></script>
<![endif]-->
<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2.js"></script>
<script>
hbspt.forms.create({
portalId: "745395",
formId: "e4b8cd32-e447-42d0-8665-673f8d56b8fe"
});
</script>
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Animal Nutrition Focus Areas
<>Article Type
<>Topics

The Chipotle Crisis: Crucial lessons from a cautionary tale

Submitted by eivantsova on Tue, 07/26/2016 - 11:30

“Transparency, in the age of internet, is no longer an option; it’s essential,” said Aidan Connolly, chief innovation officer and vice president of corporate accounts, Alltech, during his talk about the Chipotle crisis at ONE: The Alltech Ideas Conference.

Chipotle has been a leading advocate of food chain transparency while also endeavoring to elevate the experience of fast food. The company embodies the “fast casual” definition – a step above fast food but not quite a sit-down restaurant.

“It sets the standard for the future, and specifically, a tremendous commitment to sustainability,” noted Connolly.

Yet, in 2015, Chipotle suffered a crushing food safety crisis when more than 500 customers reported being affected by E. coli, norovirus and Salmonella over a seven-month period from July to December in the United States. Food safety experts estimated that among 500 people that were affected, at least ten of the cases went undiagnosed.

Steve Ells, Chipotle’s founder and co-CEO, publicly apologized to everyone who’d fallen ill. Demonstrating remorse and resolution, he announced a more comprehensive food safety program and changes to the company’s supply chain. However, this should have been done after the first case was reported.

“When you have that crisis you need to demonstrate the usual three rules: (1) You have a clear person in charge, (2) you have a plan of action to address the problem and (3) the plan is working. I think Chipotle has done that but a little late having five issues in a row,” said Connolly.

Despite the apology and renewed commitment to customer safety, the crisis’ effect on the brand was devastating. Chipotle’s crisis has significantly widened the gap between analysts’ high and low stock-price targets in two months, after the E. coli outbreak was reported.

“There’s nothing worse from a trust perspective. This is not the kind of problem that you can market your way out of,” said Mark Crumpacker, then chief marketing and development officer, Chipotle.

Chipotle went from a company that portrayed themselves as sustainable to being perceived as causing life-threatening diseases. Consumers thought the brand was “smug” and didn’t take it seriously enough in the beginning.

“We need to be clear that the fact of something being organic or natural is not an excuse for it to be unsafe,” stated Connolly. 

Chipotle was facing lawsuits, supply challenges, brand attacks, slowing sales and first quarter losses. Shares have fallen more than 40 percent from all-time high of USD $742 in July last year. Restaurant growth has also been a lot slower.

Nonetheless, Chipotle is bouncing back by proving they took the issue seriously through changes in internal trainings, practices and suppliers.

“Chipotle still has a very strong image and brand reputation for taste and uniqueness, but they cannot afford another mistake,” noted Connolly.

Chipotle is far from the first or last food company to be caught in a crisis. Connolly had some advice for all companies.

“We have one hour, the ‘Golden Hour’, to react to a crisis. What you do in the first hour is absolutely essential,” said Connolly.

Connolly recommended a strategy for businesses when faced with a crisis:

  • Acknowledge the situation within the “Golden Hour”
  • Promise to discover the cause, be relentless in this pursuit, share your findings and, most importantly, the actions you are taking to prevent any recurrance
  • Keep updating the public
  • Engage on social media

The bottom line is: A food safety crisis can be more preventable through proper crisis management, via four stages:

1. Prevention:

  • Employ a good food safety program. This is a minimum requirement.
  • Stay current on risk factors
  • Integrate from top to bottom. All members must follow protocol.
  • One conclusion from the Chipotle crisis is, when there are problems in several states within a few months, you have a systemic problem that you need to address in terms of education to your employees.

2. Preparation:

  • Proactively plan: Study other companies’ successes and failures
  • Monitor public discussion: Know where your customers communicate and use social media to stay in control

3. Management:

  • Acknowledge the issue
  • Buy time to get the facts
  • Do not deny involvement or responsibility
  • Do not attempt to estimate the magnitude of the problem
  • Commit to a speedy, but thorough investigation

4. Recovery:

  • Reassess your risk exposure at the end of the crisis
  • Explain implementation of changes
  • Evaluate again one year later to measure progress against your risk mitigation goals

 

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
The Chipotle Crisis: Crucial lessons from a cautionary tale
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Article Type
<>Regions
<>Topics
<>Content Author

Meeting the growing demands of China with new plant science products

Submitted by eivantsova on Wed, 07/20/2016 - 11:36

As China’s middle class continues to grow and to migrate to urban areas, it is demanding healthier, safer and more nutritious food. To help meet this demand at a local level, Dr. Mark Lyons moved to China four years ago to lead Alltech’s efforts and serves as global vice president and head of Greater China.

The company established Alltech Crop Science China, and Dr. Xue Kai serves as its technical and product manager. Dr. Steven Borst, general manager for Alltech Crop Science, is responsible for global product registration. These three experts shared their insights on how the company is helping local producers increase production efficiency in a sustainable way.
 

Why is there an emphasis on China?

Dr. Lyons: Globally, China is the second largest producer of potatoes, wheat, corn and other commodities. For years, there has been much discussion about who will feed China. The answer is: China will feed China.

As Chinese consumers travel globally, they are becoming aware of cutting-edge technology and expect that same level of knowledge in China. Alltech is committed to providing technology at a local level to meet growing global needs and will provide the best staff to support local producers.

Which crop science products will help serve this market?

Dr. Kai: Alltech Crop Science China has worked to gain product approval for two of the company’s natural plant and soil activators. The company is now finalizing registration of its unique products, designed to streamline processes for optimal performance and help revitalize soils.

The excellent results from the registration and demonstration trials conducted thus far make us extremely excited about the future of this technology in China and the role Alltech can play to support the development of new agricultural practices in this country.
 

How is Alltech supporting other efforts in China?
 

Dr. Lyons: Alltech’s China Now program is a strategic five-year plan and includes numerous educational and research initiatives in China. The company has been operating in China for 22 years and has recently partnered with Nestlé in the creation of a world-class training center, the Dairy Farming Institute in Shuangcheng, Heilongjiang province. In addition, 10 of the company’s 30 research alliances are focused on providing local support for this growing region.
 

What are future challenges and opportunities in China?
 

Dr. Borst: As Chinese producers work on continued production efficiency, they are also awakening to the same issues we are successfully addressing in the U.S. and Brazil. Common issues include addressing nutrient management needs not only for soil health, but as part of integrated crop and livestock systems.

Across the globe, farmers are working to become more precise with nutrient management. With our global expertise, we can share best practices with producers and others involved in Chinese agribusiness.

Consumers and producers alike are demanding more natural alternatives and products that fit into sustainable management systems. We are focused on providing new solutions that meet environmental sustainability and food safety standards.
 

Have a question or comment?

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Focus Areas
<>Featured Image
Meeting the growing demands of China with new plant science products
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Species
<>Focus Areas (taxonomy)
<>Hubspot
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<!--[if lte IE 8]>
<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2-legacy.js"></script>
<![endif]-->
<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2.js"></script>
<script>
hbspt.forms.create({
portalId: '745395',
formId: 'd2b1a74a-d16c-4ea9-b2fd-b17b4c1cfc91'
});
</script>
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Crop Science Focus Areas
<>Article Type
<>Regions
<>Topics
<>Image Caption

<p></p>

How do you measure performance in the poultry industry?

Submitted by eivantsova on Sat, 07/16/2016 - 11:46

In the United States and Canada, the poultry industry’s standard performance measurement is the feed conversion ratio (FCR). Calculating FCR is as simple as taking the total amount of feed consumed by the flock and dividing it by the amount of weight gained or the number of eggs produced. In other words, FCR equals input divided by output. For broiler producers, an FCR of 1.6 means that their chickens gain 1 kilogram of weight for every 1.6 kilograms of feed consumed. The lower the FCR, the more efficient animals are at converting feed into food.

Since the 1980s, poultry producers have been able to reduce their feed conversion ratios from producing a bird weighing 2 kilograms in 70 days with an FCR of 2.5 to a bird weighing the same in 29 days with an FCR of 1.5 today. This means that fewer grains are being used to produce more meat and eggs. The industry made this leap using two key strategies: genetic improvements and the inclusion of exogenous enzymes.

Exogenous enzymes allow producers to get more energy, phosphorus and amino acids from their diets, and the international unit for measuring enzyme activity is the katal. The katal represents 1 mol of substrate per second; however, the most valued unit for comparative purposes in the animal industry is the amount of the enzyme in milligrams needed to catalyze the reaction of a particular substrate, releasing 1 micromol of a final product in one minute.

It is far more difficult for producers to determine the effect a particular enzyme will have on their flock’s efficiency. Most producers will need to run field trials in order to see how the inclusion of a particular enzyme will impact their FCR. These trials can be complicated, due to the number of variables involved, and they can be very expensive, too. Being able to measure how effective a particular diet is at providing nutrients for digestion before it is fed to the animals can give a great advantage to poultry producers.

Tools like Alltech True Check™ in vitro screening can allow producers to do just that. True Check simulates poultry digestion in the lab utilizing samples of feed. This tool mimics the real life conditions of the animal’s digestive system and shows producers the amount of nutrients that are being released for digestion. With True Check, producers can do side-by-side comparisons of multiple feeding strategies and choose the one that will minimize their FCR and improve their flock’s performance the most.   

Measuring and projecting performance allows poultry producers to choose the feeding strategy that reduces their feed costs and, as a result, gives them the best chances for increasing profitability. After all, the industry can only improve what it can measure.

Have a question or comment?

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
How do you measure performance in the poultry industry?
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Species
<>Focus Areas (taxonomy)
<>Hubspot
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<!--[if lte IE 8]>
<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2-legacy.js"></script>
<![endif]-->
<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2.js"></script>
<script>
hbspt.forms.create({
portalId: '745395',
formId: '7046e5d7-6668-42e6-953d-45ac02f6a192'
});
</script>

<!--HubSpot Call-to-Action Code --><span class="hs-cta-wrapper" id="hs-cta-wrapper-a9b38a2b-71aa-4ec3-9305-dc69d440560e"><span class="hs-cta-node hs-cta-a9b38a2b-71aa-4ec3-9305-dc69d440560e" id="hs-cta-a9b38a2b-71aa-4ec3-9305-dc69d440560e"><!--[if lte IE 8]><div id="hs-cta-ie-element"></div><![endif]--><a href="https://cta-redirect.hubspot.com/cta/redirect/745395/a9b38a2b-71aa-4ec3-9305-dc69d440560e" target="_blank" ><img class="hs-cta-img" id="hs-cta-img-a9b38a2b-71aa-4ec3-9305-dc69d440560e" style="border-width:0px;" src="https://no-cache.hubspot.com/cta/default/745395/a9b38a2b-71aa-4ec3-9305-dc69d440560e.png" alt="Download our FREE egg shell strength poster here"/></a></span><script charset="utf-8" src="https://js.hscta.net/cta/current.js"></script><script type="text/javascript"> hbspt.cta.load(745395, 'a9b38a2b-71aa-4ec3-9305-dc69d440560e', {}); </script></span><!-- end HubSpot Call-to-Action Code -->
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Animal Nutrition Focus Areas
<>Article Type
<>Topics

5 tips for monitoring your herd’s rumen health

Submitted by klampert on Sat, 07/16/2016 - 09:14

France is the cradle for many famous breeds of beef animals that are used globally. Three of the most preferred French breeds are the Charolais, known for its high growth performance; the Limousine, renowned for its rearing abilities; and the Blonde d’Aquitaine, recognized for its ability to produce a high percentage of meat.

With more than 4 million suckler cows, France has one of the biggest cow-calf systems in Europe. Typically, a French farmer will have both a cow-calf system and a fattening unit for heifers, cows and culled young bulls. This allows for the entire process to be completed in one place, limiting the carbon footprint.

“Despite the many successes on French farms, acidosis is a challenge that often occurs in beef herds,” said Thomas Pacalier, a member of the 2015 Alltech Career Development Program. “Cattle that are fed corn silage-based diets consume a higher level of starch, which can cause them to develop acidosis. Fortunately, there are several simple steps that can be carried out to diminish the likelihood of an animal being affected.”

  1. Check the color of the horns. White is a sign that the rumen is operating at its optimum level, while red should be considered a warning sign.
  2. Take note of the animal’s behavior, as those suffering from acidosis may behave more aggressively (e.g., fighting with pen-mates).
  3. Analyze the manure; ideally, loose stools with a lot of undigested grain or fiber should be avoided.
  4. Watch how the animal walks and stands. Lameness can indicate that the rumen is not functioning at the desired level.
  5. Ensure the cattle are lying down and chewing after feeding. If less than 50 percent of the herd displays this type of behavior in the hours after eating, there may be an issue with digestion.

To avoid issues such as acidosis, it is important to take a regular look at the animal and its behavioral patterns. The diet should be prepared with a mixture of starch from various sources, while rough fiber should be added to the feed in order to stimulate the rumen. Maintaining a healthy rumen is the basis for ensuring high feed efficiency levels, which allow your herd to reach its peak performance. It is important to remember that small changes to the diet or management practice can unintentionally disturb rumen health. Therefore, it is important to adapt the diet in response to the insights gained from studying the animal.

Have a question or comment?

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Hubspot
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<!--[if lte IE 8]>
<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2-legacy.js"></script>
<![endif]-->
<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2.js"></script>
<script>
hbspt.forms.create({
portalId: '745395',
formId: 'e4b8cd32-e447-42d0-8665-673f8d56b8fe'
});
</script>
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Animal Nutrition Focus Areas
<>Article Type
<>Challenges
<>Topics

Beat heat stress with these cool tips

Submitted by eivantsova on Fri, 07/15/2016 - 16:37

With temperatures exceeding 80⁰ Fahrenheit (F), cows can produce 4,500 to 6,000 British thermal units (BTU) per hour, an amount similar to the output of a 1,500-watt hair dryer. Heat can have serious manifestations in the dairy cow, resulting in effects such as (but not limited to):

• Lower production

• Rumen acidosis

• Milk fat depression  

• Poor reproduction

• Laminitis/lameness

• Weakened immune system

• Mastitis

• Transition disease (retained placenta, displaced abomasum, etc.)

• Lower body condition  score

It is only natural when cows are moved to a small space, such as the holding pen, that body temperatures rise. Research shows that a cow’s body temperature will increase by 3⁰ F in 20 minutes in a holding pen where there’s no cooling. By contrast, a cow’s body temperature will drop by 3.5⁰ F in that same 20 minutes when fans and a soaker system are used. Research by the University of Arizona showed that simply cooling cows in the holding pen increased milk production by 1.7 pounds per day in the summer.

There are can be adverse effects when developing a cooling system for holding pens if incorrectly applied. Water without fans will lead to increased humidity and heat stress in the holding pen, creating a “sauna” effect. Heat stress is a result of both temperature and humidity. The temperature-humidity index (THI) threshold for reproduction is 65,which is lower than the THI of 68 for milk production

Holding pen cooling tips:             

  • Mount fans in rows, with airflow toward the back of the holding pen.
  • Place 36-inch fans every 20 to 24 feet, or place 48-inch fans every 24 to 36 feet.
  • Put 3 feet between fans (for example, between 36-inch fans mounted on 6-inch centers).
  • Fan height should be a minimum of 8 feet, as low as possible but out of reach of cows and machinery.
  • Mount fans higher if drop hose soakers like i-Wobs are used.
  • For narrow holding pens (less than 24 feet) or pens with low ceilings, fans can be alongside the pen.
  • Move air across and toward the back of the holding pen.
  • Take advantage of prevailing winds.*

*Prevailing winds may be blocked by cattle, freestall dividers or headlocks. Wind speed is typically variable and is not dependable for adequate cooling of cattle.

Have a question or comment?

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
Beat heat stress with these cool tips
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Image Caption
Photo Credit: Alamri/Arizona Sonora News Service/arizonasonoranewsservice.com
<>Species
<>Focus Areas (taxonomy)
<>Hubspot
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<!--[if lte IE 8]>
<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2-legacy.js"></script>
<![endif]-->
<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2.js"></script>
<script>
hbspt.forms.create({
portalId: '745395',
formId: '2c5ba201-30c0-4669-9dc4-c9711ca1b006'
});
</script>
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Animal Nutrition Focus Areas
<>Article Type
<>Topics
<>Image Caption

<p>Photo Credit: Alamri/Arizona Sonora News Service/arizonasonoranewsservice.com</p>

Reduce out-of-pocket feed costs: Feed more forage

Submitted by eivantsova on Tue, 07/12/2016 - 12:27

Many in the U.S. Midwest have had the luxury of increasing their forage inventory over the last couple of years, and this year continues to be on pace.

Dairy cows have the ability to transform fibrous plant materials and byproducts into high-quality milk, but the rumen microbes require available protein to perform these fiber digestion functions. Protein prices in the last month have continued to rise, and many dairy producers are now looking at ways to reduce their out-of-pocket costs and feed more of their housed forage, which typically represents 50 to 70 percent of the total mixed ration.

The rumen bacteria need ammonia-nitrogen

In order to keep the rumen bacteria working more efficiently, an effective source of ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) is needed to enhance fiber-digesting bacteria. Research has shown that the bacteria in the rumen primarily use NH3-N in the ruminal fluid, which is derived from a non-protein nitrogen (NPN) source in the feed.

Possible nitrogen sources in the dairy ration

Feed-grade urea is a common form of NPN used in dairy rations, but because of rapid ammonia release, it leads to nitrogen inefficiency and wasted energy in the dairy cow. Vegetable protein sources, such as soybean meal and canola meal, can also be a source of slow-release nitrogen, but these ingredients can have variability in nutrient composition and take up valuable space in the ration. Many producers are trying to find ways to make the ration more energy dense, especially during periods of heat stress, and feeding less bulky ingredients may help to achieve this goal. 

Optigen® is a unique protein alternative that is 256 percent equivalent crude protein from NPN and provides a sustained release of NH3-N in the rumen. This slow release allows for better synchronization with microbial protein needs while dramatically increasing nitrogen efficiency in the dairy cow. The key is to synchronize the ruminal carbohydrate and crude protein degradability in the rumen to increase microbial protein production and energy derived from rumen microbes. A combination of effective protein sources available in the rumen and post-ruminally — matching essential amino acids in the small intestine — has the potential to increase the cow’s efficiency. 

How does Optigen work?

Many rations can implement up to 6 ounces of Optigen and allow for some removal of protein from vegetable protein sources, such as soybean meal. For example, 6 ounces of Optigen provides 0.9 pounds of protein, which will replace 1.9 pounds of soybean meal, with space for 1.5 pounds of dry matter of corn silage. This will create space in the ration, which will allow the dairy producer to utilize more forage in the ration and to lower out-of-pocket costs.

In a recent trial done at the University of Wisconsin (Journal of Dairy Science 02, Suppl. 1, 290), 16 commercial dairy farms in Wisconsin incorporated Optigen into the ration and removed soybean meal. The space that it created was filled with corn or corn silage. The results show a 1-pound milk production response. You can find the full article on this research here

For more information, visit our Dairy page or contact your local Alltech representative.

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
Reduce out-of-pocket feed costs: Feed more forage
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Species
<>Focus Areas (taxonomy)
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Animal Nutrition Focus Areas
<>Article Type
<>Products
<>Regions
<>Image Caption

<p></p>

Following the pig feed to the pork chop

Submitted by msimpson on Wed, 06/29/2016 - 14:51
It is well known that feed costs represent the biggest input for producers — up to 70 percent of the production costs. Yet, without enough quality feed, producers can’t produce enough pigs of good condition and good weight. In other words, they won’t make money.
 
Converting quality feed to quality meat is what producers aim to do. But what is the process? How does a pig convert a grain-based diet into a delicious grilled tenderloin or pork chop?

It all starts in the pig’s mouth

 
To help with digestion of the nutrients, feed grains are ground into smaller particles before mixing with the other components of the final feed. All pig feed starts as mash feed — ground and mixed — but may be further processed into pellets or mixed with water for liquid feeding.
 
The starting point for the conversion of feed to food is the mouth of the pig, which may be the most important phase. Here, the feed is further broken down by the grinding action of the teeth and by natural chemical breakdown with salivary enzymes. Afterward, the feed passes through the pharynx and esophagus and enters the stomach.

Fun fact: The pH during this phase is between 1.5 and 2.5. Lemon juice, which is acidic enough to irritate your skin, has a pH around 2.2.

Getting things ready in the stomach

The stomach is where interesting things start to happen. Here, digestive enzymes, like pepsin, are released and combine with the feed, furthering the digestive process. Gastric glands secrete hydrochloric acid, reducing the pH and killing bacteria that may have traveled with the feed. Throughout the stomach, a coating of mucus protects the tissue from the low pH.
 

Nutrients find a home

As the chyme is released into the small intestine, digestion continues and absorption of nutrients begins. The pancreas plays a vital role here in releasing additional digestive enzymes, breaking down the proteins, fats and carbohydrates from the feed.
 
Passing into the second and third section of the small intestine, absorption of nutrients takes place through the intestinal mucosa, which is comprised of finger-like projections called villi. Once absorbed, nutrients like amino acids and simple sugars pass through to the circulatory system. Dietary fats enter the lymphatic system and are released into general circulation via the thoracic duct.
 
Finally, any undigested feed passes into the large intestine. Though some nutrient absorption takes place here, the main function of the large intestine is the absorption of water. With most of the water now gone, the undigested feed is condensed into a semi-solid material and passes out of the pig.
 

Making every bite count

The average conversion of feed to pork is around 2.4, meaning that for every 2.4 pounds of feed eaten, the pig will gain 1 pound. Every bite of feed not digested by the pig represents a loss for the producer. Making sure every bite counts is essential.
 
Enzymes added to the feed can help producers get the most out of their feed by improving digestion of nutrients. Specifically, Alltech uses solid state fermentation, a process that dates back to 2600 B.C. in Egypt, to produce a feed enzyme complex. Allzyme® SSF provides enzymes that work in synergy with the pig’s digestive system, helping it to digest feed and convert it to food as efficiently as possible.
 
<>Premium Content
Off
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Article Type
<>Content Author

Packing up for ag journalism boot camp

Submitted by klampert on Wed, 06/29/2016 - 09:37

Ten international agricultural journalists are packing their bags for boot camp, a special ag media tactical training in Bonn, Germany, just prior to the annual congress for the International Federation of Agricultural Journalists (IFAJ).

The lucky travelers are winners of the 11th annual IFAJ-Alltech Young Leaders Award, which recognizes 10 exceptional communicators from across the globe. This year’s group will represent North America, Belgium, Ghana, Australia, Austria, Norway, Burkina Faso, New Zealand and the United Kingdom.

According to the participants, the international diversity and interaction is a major attraction. They are eager to strengthen their reporting skills, but they also hope to learn about the agriculture industry in the boot camp’s host country of Germany and trade information with other attendees on agricultural issues from their home countries. 

“My expectations are to learn a lot from other outstanding agricultural journalists, network with my international peers at the event and enjoy learning more about German and European agriculture on the tours,” said Sarah Hill, a freelance journalist from South Dakota.

Hill is specifically hoping to learn more about what the dairy and beef industries are like in Germany and Europe. She also said she hopes to hone her skills as a writer, photographer and marketer.

Julienne Isaacs, a freelance writer based out of Canada, feels like the conference will offer a lot of new ideas for her and the other journalists in attendance.

“I have been told by other journalists that they make the IFAJ Congress a priority every year, no matter where in the world it is held,” she said. “I am expecting the conference will offer an abundance of new ideas and opportunities to connect with colleagues from around the globe.”

Isaacs is also looking forward to deepening her skills as an agricultural journalist, but mostly she is hoping to develop friendships with professionals working in very different contexts than her own and to learn from their experiences.

Inoussa Maiga, a multimedia communicator from Burkina Faso, shares the same views as Hill and Isaacs in the sense that she expects to learn new ideas from different sectors of the world.

“This is, for me, a unique opportunity to learn from others’ experiences, the state of agricultural journalism and communication in their countries,” said Maiga.

A lot of the participants are already friends through social media, so they are looking forward to meeting each other in person.

Jennifer Latzke, a previous boot camp participant and winner of the IFAJ-Alltech Young Leaders Award in 2013, explained that she and the other participants started a Facebook group about a month before meeting so that they could all introduce themselves.

“When we finally got together in person, it was like seeing old friends,” she said.

For Latzke, the coolest part was meeting people from around the world, talking about agriculture in their own regions and realizing that they really have more in common than they have differences.

“Agriculture is such a global industry today that it's so powerful to have connections around the world to talk to about global events that affect not just U.S. farmers, but their foreign counterparts, too,” she said.

Latzke also shared that they may just be together for 10 days or so, but they will make lifelong friends. Her final advice to the 2016 participants:

“Be prepared to not only learn from your instructors, but from each other as well. It's the sharing of lessons from your countries, those personal experiences and connections, that will prove more lasting than you can imagine. We may not all have the same skills sets, but we all have the common purpose of communication and education of our readers and listeners. You'd be amazed at what you'll pick up from your counterpart halfway around the world!”

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Article Type
<>Topics
<>Image Caption

<p></p>

The enzyme evolution in animal feed

Submitted by eivantsova on Wed, 06/22/2016 - 09:29

Even though the first exogenous enzyme was synthesized in 1969, enzymes in animal nutrition have been used in animal nutrition for less than 30 years. Their original purpose was to degrade so-called anti-nutritional molecules from grains used in feedstuffs, such as wheat, barley and wheatgrass. These grains, when used as a primary source of carbohydrates in an animal diet, presented less digestibility and nutritional content when compared with other grains such as corn and sorghum. As a result, they often led to decreases in animal performance.

A brief history of enzyme use in animal feed

The first enzymes developed by the biotech industry were the arabinoxylans and beta glucanases. Their function was to degrade non-starch polysaccharides, which are the fibrous portions of the grain. These enzymes reduced the viscosity of the non-digested grain in the intestine. The first trials proved that adding exogenous enzymes to wheat-based diets improved digestibility in monogastric animals. These early studies also helped scientists understand the mode of action of these enzymes and enabled them to develop new enzymes capable of working on a wider variety of substrates.

At the beginning of the 1990s, the main topic of conversation among nutritionists and researchers was what they considered to be the inevitable decline of sources of phosphorus in animal feed. The additives and supplements industry responded quickly to this challenge by focusing on enzymes capable of releasing more phosphorous through a molecule usually not present in livestock animals: phytate. Fungal phytase were able to chemically breakdown the phytate, releasing additional phosphorus in feed for pigs and poultry. While the nutritional matrixes of phytase would not be consolidated until 2000, they showed promising initial values of 0.05 phosphorus and a maximum of 0.10 percent available phosphorus.

The benefits of enzymes

Even though there are still some segments of the pig and poultry industries that do not use exogenous enzymes, the growth of the enzyme market has been substantial. Since enzymes improve the digestibility of plant-based feed ingredients, they offer immediate economic benefits to animal production. Enzymes have allowed producers to further improve their feed conversion rates, the uniformity of their flocks and herds, and the efficiency of their feed mills since fewer grains are needed to be purchased and processed.  

With all these benefits available to producers, the animal nutrition industry is becoming more eager to study enzyme technology in greater depth with the aim of further optimizing animal production. Research is ongoing on the effects of degradation of different substrates, different methods of producing enzymes, epigenetic effects of enzymes in the formation and development of the intestine, and interaction with the microbiota and intestinal health, as well as their direct or indirect action on the immune system. As our understanding of enzymes evolves, we should expect a revolution in how we feed our animals.

Click here for more information about the Alltech Enzyme Management Program.

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
The enzyme evolution in animal feed
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Topics
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Animal Nutrition Focus Areas
<>Article Type
<>Regions
<>Topics
<>Programs and Services
Subscribe to Blog
Loading...