Skip to main content

Don’t forget about aflatoxin B1!

Submitted by amartin on Tue, 06/07/2016 - 20:55

Commonly known as field mycotoxins, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is causing some buzz across North America. The well-known toxin is showing up in storage grains, posing heightened risks to dairy production.

Looking at feedstuff samples submitted and tested through the Alltech 37+® mycotoxin analytical services laboratory over the past several years, results show a pattern of very low total aflatoxin levels and occurrence across North America. However, in recent months, AFB1 has been appearing more frequently and at higher levels in samples submitted from the Northern United States and Canada.

Aflatoxins, part of the Aspergillus fungi family, are commonly detected in cottonseeds/cottonseed meal, typically grown in the Southern United States. More recently, the Northern states and Ontario are finding that commodities such as haylage, corn silage, corn and high moisture corn are testing positive, with significant levels of AFB1 above 20 parts per billion (ppb), while cottonseed samples have contained no measurable levels. The question is, why are rising levels occurring now?

The reasons behind rising levels of aflatoxin B1

This spring, North America experienced above normal temperatures. These warmer temperatures, in combination with the weather at harvest and various storage conditions could be promoting the growth of Aspergillus mold, causing an increased observance of AFB1. Research from Cheli et al. (2013) showed that Aspergillus flavus can grow in a wide range of temperatures from 50 to 109 degrees Fahrenheit (10-43°C), and in pH levels ranging from 2.1 to 11.2. The same is true for aflatoxin production by mold. If producers have not stored their feedstuffs correctly, changes in environmental temperatures after the post-winter thaw and during spring months can cause an increase in mycotoxin production.

Another study by Keller et al. (2013) demonstrated AFB1 contamination frequency levels were higher on post-fermentation silage samples when compared to pre-fermented samples. This suggests that Aspergillus flavus and AFB1 contamination is enhanced during storage. Poor storing conditions and improper practices during the ensiling process, or even after a silo is cut for feed out, can lead to this kind of contamination.

According to the Alltech 37+ mycotoxin analysis, corn silage samples collected and analyzed from January through April 2016 across North America saw AFB1 in approximately 30 percent of the 116 samples at levels up to 90 ppb. For the same time period in 2015, AFB1 tested positive in only six percent of samples, and zero percent in 2014.

aflatoxin chart 2016.jpg

The implications of rising aflatoxin B1 levels 

Aflatoxins at higher levels can cause a decrease in feed intake, altered rumen function, lowered milk production and increased somatic cell count. At lower levels, cows may not always show symptoms of aflatoxin consumption but may have altered milk quality due to the occurrence of aflatoxin M1 (AFM1). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations state that active levels of AFB1 may not exceed 20 ppb in feedstuffs or feeds for dairy cows and 0.5 ppb of AFM1 before milk must be discarded. In these cases, producers may need to dump milk, impacting the bottom line.

Results from the Alltech 37+ also showed a multi-contamination setting with 93 percent of samples testing positive for two or more mycotoxins. Other mycotoxins frequently present at higher levels include type B trichothecenes (DON group) at 84 percent, and fumonisins and fusaric acid at 81 percent. In settings such as these, mitigation strategies such as the use of a sequestering agent can aid in offsetting the negative effects of multiple mycotoxin contamination on cow health.

As corn silage is only one component of the total mixed rations (TMR), producers are encouraged to protect their herds by testing feed for moisture, mold count, yeast count and mycotoxins to understand what is being included in the TMR. Implementation of proper storage and feeding practices is crucial to minimize the opportunity for mycotoxins to flourish. When cows do not perform to their potential, corn silage quality and possible contamination should be considered.

To learn more on AFB1 or challenges multiple mycotoxin contamination can pose to herd health and performance, visit www.knowmycotoxins.com.

Have a question or comment?

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Hubspot
<!--[if lte IE 8]>

<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2-legacy.js"></script>

<![endif]-->

<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2.js"></script>

<script>

hbspt.forms.create({

portalId: '745395',

formId: '8790727d-7efa-463c-a020-6d1c151bf545'

});

</script>
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Crop Science Focus Areas
<>Article Type
<>Regions
<>Programs and Services

37+ Finds Mycotoxin Feed Contamination a Consistent Opponent

Submitted by eivantsova on Tue, 10/21/2014 - 14:55

Alltech’s 37+ mycotoxin analysis program has run more than 5,200 tests, each searching for over 37 mycotoxins in animal feed. In many cases, these mycotoxins can individually harm the animal when consumed, but many tests showed a combination of these toxins, which can cause harm to not only the animals but the overall performance and profitability of the farm. Of the thousands of tests run, 99.68 percent of samples contained at least one mycotoxin.

You could say that mycotoxins are a consistent opponent. On average, every feed sample contained 7.3 mycotoxins. Mycotoxins have been shown to reduce feed intake, damage gut integrity and cause poor fertility. Each of these issues can be a major cost to producers, so identifying and addressing these hidden challenges is very important.

With the 37+ program, mycotoxins can’t remain hidden for long. Alltech’s Mycotoxin Management program places high value on quality, efficiency, traceability, food safety and the environment. This program is designed to reduce risk and improve safety while ensuring that mycotoxins do not limit livestock performance and profitability.

Learn more about 37+ or Alltech’s solutions for mycotoxins by visiting us at alltech.com or contacting your local Alltech representative.

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
37+ Finds Mycotoxin Feed Contamination a Consistent Opponent
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Article Type
<>Regions
<>Programs and Services

Watch Your New Wellies

Submitted by eivantsova on Mon, 10/06/2014 - 09:36

Last week began with Dr Finbar Mulligan from the UCD veterinary hospital coming out to speak to us Monday and Tuesday on broad aspects of animal nutrition, performance and health. Finbar is an extremely intelligent man and passed his knowledge onto us in an easily understandable manner. It will be of use to us through the Dairy Career Development Programme (DCDP) and for many years to come.

Body Condition Scoring

On Wednesday we took a trip along with three of the DCDP members to Christy Reynolds’ farm in Walterstown to body condition score (BCS) his cows. It was an ideal farm for BCS as his herd ranged from fresh cows to recently dry cows. This gave us a good scale to work with. Some of the CDP students were a little put off by the smell, I may add, and when a cow lifted her tail beside Aoife she was not long about moving swiftly away to avoiding getting cow feces on her new wellies.

Penn State Shaker Box

Finbar walked us through how to correctly BCS cows and then let us assess the selection of cows and take records in order to check our progression. No need to doubt us we got them all correct. Well, so we told Finbar anyway. Colm Duffy was also there and took us through faecal washing using the Penn state shaker to assess how much of the feed is being digested in the cow’s rumen.

Learning about IFM and 37+

Thursday and Friday we received a talk from Amanda Gehman who is based in the USA and spearheads the IFM tests and 37+ to name a few. It is good for us to be able to explain to farmers how their feed samples are tested. We were then forced by John to present slides we had prepared on the work we did the week before. Some of us nailed it and some of us didn’t. Well, Amanda nailed it anyway. So we struggled through ours and then out of nowhere John springs a 2 hour assessment on Finbar’s material on us. Ten o’clock and we are still at it, but all is good. We are almost finished and it is the weekend. I have a championship semi-final tomorrow so an early night is on the cards. Over and out from DCDP for this week.

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
Watch Your New Wellies
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Species
<>Focus Areas (taxonomy)
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Animal Nutrition Focus Areas
<>Article Type
<>Regions
<>Topics
<>Programs and Services
<>Image Caption

<p></p>

Subscribe to Alltech 37+
Loading...