Skip to main content

Abejas bien alimentadas, abejas mas sanas

Submitted by mmolano on Mon, 06/01/2020 - 07:56

Las abejas bien alimentadas tienen una mayor resistencia a las enfermedades y a otros factores ambientales como la aplicación de pesticidas o la exposición a parásitos, que pueden dañar su salud. Por este motivo, Alltech, empresa líder en alimentación animal, ha lanzado BEE-SACC, alimento proteico completo diseñado para alimentar los enjambres en épocas de carencia en el campo. BEE-SACC es un producto único y exclusivo en el mercado.



BEE-SACC es un hidrolizado de levadura de cerveza Saccharomyces cerevisiae, cepa 1026, que aporta un alto nivel de proteína de fácil asimilación, con un perfil muy similar al del polen, aportando los niveles de aminoácidos esenciales necesarios para el desarrollo de la colonia.

BEE-SACC aporta azúcares, principalmente en forma de mono y disacáridos, altamente asimilables por parte de las abejas, que además le confieren una gran palatabilidad. También garantiza los niveles adecuados de vitaminas (especialmente grupo B) y aporta zinc y selenio en forma orgánica (Bioplex Zn, Sel-Plex) que son mucho más biodisponibles que las formas inorgánicas usadas en los suplementos alimenticios.

BEE-SACC además, aporta prebióticos (Actigen) que ayuda a mejorar el sistema inmunitario de las abejas, que es más débil que el de la mayoría de las especies del reino animal, por lo que las hace muy sensibles a infecciones, desórdenes intestinales y factores externos.

Su utilización es recomendable en las siguiente situaciones:

Así, como también, cuando las colmenas se utilizan para la polinización de algunos cultivos como el girasol.

BEE-SACC se presenta en forma de torta con gran superficie que permite maximizar el acceso de las abejas y que es fácil de manejar por el apicultor. Se administra en función de la actividad de la colmena. El consumo normal es de 1 torta cada 15 días, en colmenas con más del 60% de los cuadros ocupados.

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
Abejas bien alimentadas, abejas mas sanas
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Article Type

‘Let’s Talk Poultry’ – Teagasc and Alltech launch webinar series to tackle poultry industry issues

Submitted by kmeegan on Fri, 05/29/2020 - 07:09

Ireland’s poultry industry will gain industry insights over a four-part webinar series beginning June 3, at 2 p.m. Hosted by Teagasc, with support from animal nutrition company, Alltech; prominent topics such as avian influenza, gut health and layer management will be examined. 

 

The 45-minute webinars will go live every fortnight, starting on Wednesday, June 3, with a discussion on ‘Avian Influenza and Biosecurity’ with James Greaves, Broiler Breeder and Broiler consultant and Joe O’Flaherty, Veterinary Public Health, Pig and Poultry Health Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine. “We’ve listened to the industry, and the topics for this webinar series reflect their current concerns. Through these four webinars, we will touch on the most pressing issues facing poultry farmers and integrators at the moment,” explained Rebecca Tierney, poultry advisor, Teagasc. 

 

The second webinar will explore the role of ‘Chick Start’ and will be hosted by Professor Steve Collett, clinical associate professor at the Poultry Diagnostic and Research Center, University of Georgia. Padraig McKenna, flock supervisor at Whitaker’s Hatcheries and Martin Humphrey sales director, Humphrey Feeds & Pullets will look at ‘Layer Rearing and Management’ and best practices as part of the third webinar. The ‘Let’s Talk Poultry’ series will finish with an industry overview and outlook from Peter Duggan, Meat Division at Bord Bia and Rory Mannion, Quality Assurance administrator, Bord Bia. 

 

“The ‘Let’s Talk Poultry’ webinar series is aimed at providing timely information and support for the industry. Teagasc has sourced leading experts in biosecurity, layer management and nutrition, with the bonus of an industry overview at the end. This is a ‘must-watch’ webinar series for anyone looking to gain inside industry information,” said Niall Brennan, Alltech Ireland poultry coordinator.  

 

The webinar series will be hosted on Zoom and is free to join. The first in the series starts on Wednesday, June 3, at 2 p.m. Participants will have the chance to pose their questions to speakers at the end of each webinar. 

 

To register, log on to www.teagasc.ie/letstalkpoultry 

 

Date 

Topic 

Speaker(s) 

Wednesday, June 3  

14:00 

Mitigating bird flu with better biosecurity – What can we do? 

James Greaves, broiler breeder and broiler consultant  

Joe O’Flaherty, DAFM 

Wednesday, June 17 14:00 

Chick Start –The dos and don’ts to a healthier crop  

Prof. Steve Collett 

Wednesday, July 1 

14:00  

From chicks to eggs – Improving the layer cycle 

Martin Humphrey, Humphrey Feeds & Pullets 

Padraig McKenna, flock supervisor, Whitaker’s Hatcheries 

Wednesday, July 15 

14:00 

Irish poultry industry outlook   

Peter Duggan, Bord Bia 

Rory Mannion, Bord Bia 

 

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
‘Let’s Talk Poultry’ – Teagasc and Alltech launch webinar series to tackle poultry industry issues
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Animal Nutrition Focus Areas
<>Article Type
<>Image Caption

‘Let’s Talk Poultry’ – Teagasc and Alltech launch webinar series to tackle poultry industry issues  

3 myths debunked: Animal agriculture's real impact on the environment

Submitted by aledford on Thu, 05/28/2020 - 15:47

The way the public and the media perceive animal agriculture’s environmental impact can, and should, change. New research from Oxford University and the University of California, Davis have recently debunked some of the most critical and long-standing myths surrounding animal agriculture. But can this breakthrough overcome animal agriculture’s bad reputation?

The current narrative about animal agriculture says that ruminant livestock animals (e.g., beef cattle, dairy cattle, etc.) produce methane. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas. Thus, animal agriculture is bad for the environment.

During a keynote presentation for the Alltech ONE Virtual Experience, Dr. Frank Mitloehner, professor at the University of California, Davis and air quality specialist, boldly proclaimed a path for animal agriculture to become climate-neutral.

Yes, “you heard me right — climate-neutral,” said Dr. Mitloehner. He said he would like to, “get us to a place where we have the impacts of animal agriculture that are not detrimental to our climate.”

Important Greenhouse Gases to Know

 

3 myths about animal agriculture’s environmental impact debunked

 

Myth #1: Methane (the most common greenhouse gas, or GHG, in animal agriculture) acts just like other GHGs in the environment.

Fact: The three main greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide, all impact the environment in critically different ways, especially as it relates to their source, life span in the atmosphere and global warming potential.

Carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide are known as “stock gases.”  Stock gases are long-lived gases and once emitted will continue to build up in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide, for example, has an estimated lifespan in the atmosphere of 1,000 years, meaning carbon dioxide emitted from the year 1020 may still be in the atmosphere today. Methane, on the other hand, is a “flow gas.” Flow gases are short-lived gases and are removed from the atmosphere at a more rapid pace. Methane’s lifespan in the atmosphere is approximately 10 years. This means a flow gas like methane would impact the environment for a duration that is nearly 100 times shorter than the stock gas carbon dioxide.

What causes these gases in the first place? Carbon dioxide is created by the burning of fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are used as the energy source to power most homes, vehicles and industry globally. As the graph below depicts, Dr. Mitloehner refers to stock gases like carbon dioxide as a “one-way street” because they only accumulate in the environment over time due to their long lifespan.

Methane can be produced in a variety of methods, but most commonly, it’s produced through the rumination process in beef and dairy livestock (i.e., belching). As a short-lived flow gas, “The only time that you really add new additional methane to the atmosphere with the livestock herd is throughout the first 10 years of its existence or if you increase your herd sizes,” explained Dr. Mitloehner. Methane levels do not increase if herd sizes remain constant because methane is being broken down at the same rate it is being produced.

“What I'm saying here by no means (is) that methane doesn't matter,” he continued. “While that methane is in the atmosphere, it is heat-trapping, it is a potent greenhouse gas. But the question really is, do our livestock herds add to additional methane, meaning additional carbon in the atmosphere, leading to additional warming? And the answer to that question is no. As long as we have constant herds or even decreasing herds, we are not adding additional methane, and hence not additional warming. And what I just said to you is a total change in the narrative around livestock.”

Alternatively, carbon dioxide is created from extracting fossil fuels that are millions of years old and are trapped under the Earth’s surface.

“These long-lived climate pollutants are only emitted,” said Dr. Mitloehner. “They are put into the atmosphere, but there's no real sink for it in a major way.”

This demonstrates that carbon dioxide and methane are very different types of gases (stock versus flow) and have very different lifespans in the environment (1,000 years versus 10 years), but what about their global warming potential?

 

Myth #2: The current method for assessing the global warming potential (GWP100) of greenhouse gases properly accounts for all important variables.

Fact: The initial method for calculating GWP100 misrepresents the impact of short-lived flow gases, like methane, on future warming. The new “GWP*” is an improved and more representative measurement.

The initial GWP100 measures produced by the Kyoto Protocol nearly 30 years ago marked a very positive step for assessing global warming. The initial documents included many footnotes and caveats to account for variability and unknown values. “But the footnotes were cut off, and people ran with (it),” said Dr. Mitloehner. “And in my opinion, that was a very dangerous situation that has really gotten animal agriculture into a lot of trouble, actually, quite frankly.”

The current GWP100 measurement generates an over-assessment of methane’s contributions to global warming. Currently, in short, GWP100 measurements are all standardized to a billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. So, all non-carbon dioxide emissions are converted by multiplying the amount of the emissions of each gas by its global warming potential over 100 years value. Methane has a GWP100 value of 28, meaning it is 28 times more potent than carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Unfortunately, this type of calculation completely omits the fact that flow gases, like methane, are destroyed after approximately 10 years and would not continue for the entire 100-year duration as described in the GWP100 formula. Additionally, it underestimates the impact that stock gases, like carbon dioxide, would have that persist in the environment for 1,000 years.

Dr. Mitloehner cited Dr. Myles Allen from Oxford University as the pioneer of a new calculation called “GWP*.” The new GWP* calculation better accounts for both gas intensity and gas lifespan in the atmosphere in its measurements of global warming. This is a new narrative to explain global warming emissions and, Dr. Mitloehner said, “you will see it will gain momentum, and it will become the new reality” soon.

 

Myth #3: To keep up with increasing demand and global population growth, the United States has continued to increase its numbers of beef and dairy cattle, thus increase methane emissions.

Fact: The United States reached peak beef and dairy cattle numbers in the 1970s and has reduced its number of animals every decade since, resulting in 50 million fewer cattle in total.

Over the last half-century, the United States has made tremendous progress to improve efficiency and increase productivity while also reducing total beef and dairy cattle numbers. For example, in 1950, the U.S. dairy cow herd peaked at 25 million cattle. Today, the dairy herd is approximately 9 million cows, yet it is producing 60% more milk — that’s significantly more milk with 14 million fewer cows!

Though cattle numbers have continued to increase in countries such as India and China, this means the United States has not increased methane output — thus not increasing GHG contributions from livestock — over the last five decades.

 

So, what does all this mean?

Animal agriculture, unlike any other sector, can not only reduce its GHG output, but can also create a net cooling effect on the atmosphere (i.e., actively reduce global warming).

The three scenarios shown below demonstrate the important differences between carbon dioxide and methane, and their ability to generate global cooling. With rising emissions, warming carbon dioxide increases at a growing rate, while methane also increases. With constant emissions, warming from carbon dioxide continues to increase while methane no longer contributes to additional warming.  

“But now, the thing that really excites me, and that's the third scenario,” said Dr. Mitloehner. “So, imagine this scenario here, where we decrease methane by 35%. If we do so, then we actively take carbon out of the atmosphere. And that has a net cooling effect. If we find ways to reduce methane, then we counteract other sectors of societies that do contribute ― and significantly so ― to global warming, such as flying, driving, running air conditioners and so on.”

Examples of Dr. Mitloehner’s 35% reduction scenario have proven to be possible. Over the last five years alone, California has reduced methane emissions by 25% via a combination of improved efficiency and incentives for anaerobic digesters, alternative manure management practices and other technologies.

Though the narrative on animal agriculture has been negative on climate change, there is now increasing hope and new data to debunk even the most long-standing criticisms.

Dr. Mitloehner concluded, “because I know if we can do it here (in California), it can be done in other parts of the country and in other parts of the world. If we indeed achieve such reductions of greenhouse gas, particularly of short-lived greenhouse gases such as methane, then that means that our livestock sector will be on a path for climate neutrality.”

 

Visit one.alltech.com for more information.

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Hubspot
<!--[if lte IE 8]>
<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2-legacy.js"></script>
<![endif]--><script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2.js"></script><script>
hbspt.forms.create({
portalId: "745395",
formId: "1c790526-1f39-4ebc-bf3e-71b9c86fea92"
});
</script>
<>Feature
Off
<>Article Type
<>Content Author

Massimo Zanin - Essential agribusiness in Italy

Submitted by rladenburger on Thu, 05/28/2020 - 14:19

Italy was one of the first countries hit by COVID-19, and after an eight-week lockdown, the next phase of reopening businesses has begun. Massimo Zanin of Veronesi, a major Italian animal feed company, details how Veronesi was able to safely help maintain the food supply chain throughout the lockdown and what he is hoping will happen for his country and the agriculture sector in general beyond the pandemic.

This episode is part of a special AgFuture series on the impact of COVID-19 on the food supply chain. Join us to hear how those on the frontlines of the global pandemic are working to overcome adversity and feed the world.

The following is an edited transcript of Michelle Michael's interview with Massimo Zanin. Click below to hear the full audio.

Michelle:       Hello! I'm Michelle Michael. In this special series of AgFuture, we're talking with those working along the food supply chain about the impact of COVID-19. My guest today is Mr. Massimo Zanin. Thank you so much for joining us today.

 

Massimo:       Good morning! Thank you for inviting me.

 

Michelle:       And I guess it would be good afternoon to you; you're in the northeast part of Italy, right? Near to Venice?

 

Massimo:       Yes, close to Venice, about one hour by car from Venice. Verona is the name of the city where we are based.

 

Michelle:       Italy was hit quite hard by the coronavirus pandemic, but you're starting to see a glimmer of hope, I think, right? What's life like for you right now?

 

Massimo:       Well, personally, let's say that, now — we had these eight weeks (of) lockdown. That means that in the last eight weeks, the only things we were able to do was come from home to the office and from the office going home. The other thing was shopping, but not so often. That's all. The rest of the things were not allowed, really. I think what the Italians in general demonstrated in these last eight weeks was (that) they were able to follow the rules given by the government, so really, they stayed home for eight weeks, (which is) incredible for the Italians.

 

Michelle:       It is incredible. Are things now starting to open back up slowly, though?

 

Massimo:       Yes, we are starting to go out. Today, after eight weeks, we begin the so-called phase two. That means that more industries are going to start, to restart, to produce, so that means that around four and a half million people are going out every day from today. I think that we (will) begin to see a sort of light at the end of the tunnel and we hope, really, to see a better time in the next (few) weeks, and “a better time” means more freedom to go out — and also from an economic point of view, because we cannot forget that not only the industry but all the shops, all the small activities (that) are here now, (were) shut down, so really, we hope to see all these activities starting again, because it's important for our people and for the economy of Italy to start again.

 

Michelle:       Speaking of business, Massimo, you're with Veronesi, one of the biggest poultry, swine and rabbit integrators, and you have a feed mill there as well. On a very basic level, can you explain what that means? What does a poultry, swine and rabbit integrator do?

 

Massimo:       Well, as an integrator, we are involved in all the activities along the supply chain. That means producing feed. We are in the market of raw materials. We breed many, many different kinds of animals — chicken, poultry, but also cattle, pigs, rabbits and so on, and then we slaughter and we transform these meats into products that we sell in the supermarkets. That means that we are involved in the whole supply chain.

 

                        At Veronesi, I imagine that Veronesi is, nowadays, a company that employs directly almost 9,000 people, but if we go also to the people working for us, even if not directly employed (by us), we are talking around 15,000 people working for the group. It's one of the most important agribusiness groups in Italy, one of the biggest in Europe, (with) a consolidated turnover of over €3 billion, or US$3.3 billion. And because Veronesi was founded 62 years ago in 1958, I have to say that it started on the first of May, and a few (weeks) ago, we celebrated our 62nd anniversary.

 

It was founded by Apollinare Veronesi, our founder, but in 1958, he was already 47, so not exactly a young guy starting this new adventure after the Second World War. He was already married and was the father of five children when he saw that animal feed was a new, important sector for the growth of the country at that time. At that time, we have to imagine that, in Italy, animal breeding was not exactly what we see today. Every family had, at that time, a couple of pigs or ten chickens to feed, but what did the people give to the animals at that time? Probably the waste of their meals, their family meals, so Apollinare Veronesi saw how important it could be to improve the quality of the feed given to the animals, so he started in 1958 with the feed production, and ten years later, in 1968, he began his involvement in the poultry sector, breeding first chickens and then turkeys, importing the turkeys from the U.S., because turkeys were not present at all in Italy. Then, later on, in the '80s, he expanded his activity to pig breeding and slaughtering.

 

                        Over the years, I'd have to say that this remained as the main sector, but the activity has been integrated or completed via internal growth and also acquisitions. Nowadays, we are involved in many activities, but we can, let's say, organize all the activities in three large areas. We call them the three Fs: feed, farming and food. We farm thousands and thousands of animals, and we go down after slaughtering, after processing the meat, to the market with two main brands, which are AIA and Negroni. AIA is the brand we use for fresh — even if processed, but still fresh — meat products. AIA is a product sold mainly in Europe, North Africa and Europe. Negroni is our brand for salami, ham, these great, typical Italian products. Negroni products, you can find all over the world, from Japan to the U.S., so everywhere. Now, our consolidated turnover is €3 billion, and almost 15% of our turnover is export.

 

Michelle:       Being one of the largest and most important agricultural companies, what are you facing today because of COVID-19 in your business?

 

Massimo:       Well, I have to say that we have (had) to change completely our way of work. We were, let's say, lucky because agribusiness has been considered, personally (in Italy) but also in other counties, as an essential business. That means that we choose and we're in the position to continue to work, but obviously — you remember that Italy was the first country outside China to be hit by the COVID-19 epidemic. It's true that the first stages were in a small area south of Milan. This area is really small, but it's a high-intensity area for our sector. In this area, there are a lot of farms, mainly dairy farmers, also pigs, and many feed mills. One of our feed mills — we have seven feed mills around Italy, but one of them is close to this area, so our involvement, I have to say, was immediate.

 

                        I remember the first time they came (with news of) the so-called patient zero. The first case of (COVID-19) positivity found in Italy was on February 21. It was Friday evening, and the day after, we had our first talk. They called up the board of the executive committee to decide how to manage the situation. It was really a new situation for everyone, and it was really unexpected, a new situation for everybody. We were afraid about the health of our people because we knew that we could go on with the production, but on the other side, we wanted to be sure to let our people work in a safe and healthy position.

 

                        So, really, we worked a lot that week to define protocols together with the workers, together with the unions, because the unions were afraid about this new situation, so we worked together in order to be able to continue to work without any risks, and so far, we have done it, I have to say.

 

Michelle:       That's great news. What does that mean specifically? What precautions did workers have to take on the job so that they remain safe? What did that look like?

 

Massimo:       Of course, there are different situations in different factories. If we look to the slaughterhouse, we can imagine how many people are working in the slaughtering line, and so the first concern was to give more distance between one (person) to the other. So, we intervened in the number of people working at the same time in that slaughtering line. That means that we have to slow down the rate of the slaughtering. That means that we try to reduce the number of the people involved in every single shift in the slaughterhouse. On the other side, we built a special track to go in and to come out (of the building on). Of course, every one of the people working in this situation was equipped with masks, gloves and all the equipment needed in those situations. I have to say that after two months of work in this situation, we are really — I don't want to say it out loud, but everything went really well.

 

                        On the other side, if we look to the feed mills, the situation is completely different because, thanks to high investments in the last years in automation, in the feed mills, we have limited staff presence, so it's easier to manage them, to make them operate in a condition of safety. Also, the people working in the feed mills were equipped with masks and gloves. Also, in the feed mills, we try to reduce the number of people per shift because the big concern was, from the beginning, to avoid the risk to have a stock shortage, because in the event of (COVID-19) positivity, of course, we should put in quarantine all the people working together, so we reduced the number of people per shift in the feed mills. Also, in the feed mills, I have to say there's (been) no problem until today.

 

                        Also, the truck drivers, looking to the truck drivers, they were the first figures involved in the program because in Italy, there was the so-called red area, the first area, the small area south of Milan, and they had to go there to deliver the feed, so they were the first people involved in the emergency. Also, to them, we gave our procedures. We gave them masks and gloves needed to get in contact with the farmers. They were invited to follow all the safety rules of the group. I have to say that in the last eight weeks, it's (been) really difficult to enter a donation factory, but really, it was necessary.

 

Michelle:       We know the workers were dramatically impacted. What about the customers? Were the customers of the company affected as well?

 

Massimo:       Of course, our customers, which are the farmers, they were involved also in the confusion of the market, but first, in our behavior to the customers, the farmers, we tried to find different ways to maintain this kind of comfort. Really, we invented different ways (to stay connected), like more frequent calls to them.

 

                        Our first concern, also there, was to say to the sellers, to the consultants that would usually have contact with the farmers, to be more frequently than normal getting in contact with them. We invented many ways to make it under a hashtag. The hashtag is #veronesiconvoy, #veronesiwithyou. Under this hashtag, we prepared more frequent newsletters, personalized WhatsApp messages, corporate videos explaining to them what we were doing in order to maintain the same level of service, of quality of the product and of services. We were giving them video messages. Of course, our experts, our technicians, (since they were) not in the position to ever have physical or personal contact, they began to use these platforms — like WhatsApp video calls — to give, in a remote way, their suggestions, the advice that the farmers needed. So I have to say that our breeders, we know that our customers are really our greatest asset, so they cannot think that they've been left alone for even one minute, so Veronesi has to be always there together with the customers, the farmers.

 

Michelle:       As much as it seems impossible to prepare for a pandemic, do you think the agriculture sector could have done things differently? And on that note, what lessons can we learn from this in the way our food supply chain works?

 

Massimo:       To be prepared, to be really prepared for such a pandemic, I think, was impossible. The question is, probably, “What can we do to improve in order to be better prepared for it?” There is not only one answer, of course. If I look to the Italian market, we are, for example, a net importer of raw materials. So, even if we think (we should try) to be more prepared, we cannot change our way of (importing) the crops in Italy. We are trying to increase the quantity of raw materials to grow in Italy, but it's impossible. We are a small garden. We cannot be competitive with the production in many other countries, so we still remain a net importer. I have to say that even if we were not prepared for the pandemic, after the first few days, where we were all afraid about the risks of shortages of raw materials — both macro raw materials, grains and so on, but on the other side, also, of micro ingredients — after the first day, we had to say that everything has come in the right time.

 

                        What we need is a better dialogue between the producer of the products like milk, like animals, and the final market, the consumer market, because the problem, for example, for some sectors was where to sell the product that usually went to export, went to foreign countries. When the flights were stopped, of course — for example, the wonderful mozzarella di bufala, the buffalo-milk mozzarella, had no more market, or the part of the market (where it sold the most), which was the export market, was stopped, so we had a surplus of production. We probably need a better dialogue between the first part of the production and the transformation, processing and distribution. This is what we need. For the future, what I see is a better dialogue along the supply chain.

 

Michelle:       That certainly could hold a lot of positives. How long do you think the agricultural sector could feel the impact from COVID-19?

 

Massimo:       When we talk of the agriculture sector, we are talking of so many different products. Look to the wine. Look to the vegetables. Look to the tourists and so on. Look into our sector, the sector we are involved in, the meat sector and the dairy sector — meat because we process and sell meat products, and on the other side, the dairy sector, because we sell feed to the dairy farmers. Probably the impact will be, for Italy, relatively long.

 

                        I'm positive about the future. I'm for sure positive about the future, but I have to say that remember that the tourism, for Italy, represents 13% of our GDP. Imagine that only in the last two and a half months — that means the beginning of spring, Eastern time — we have, usually, in Italy, 80 million tourists present. If we consider that they eat usually twice a day, that means that we lost, in the last weeks, around 160 million meals. This means, of course, meat, cheese. It means processed products like ham. It means wine, too. What we lose with tourists, we cannot recover with the consumption of the Italians. That's why I think that we need time to go back to the normal situation, to the situation before the pandemic.

 

Michelle:       As every economy has struggled around the globe, when things are safe again, I'm sure you want those tourists back.

 

Massimo:       Well, sure. That's for sure. This new experience, the experience of the pandemic — which is a first for everyone, I think, in the world — tells us that we can't wait to do things. As Latins say, "Carpe diem." So, the message for all the people listening to us today is: don't wait. For the next year, plan to visit Italy. We need everyone's support, really. Here in Italy, you'll find culture, history, nature, people who know how to work with you and push you, and the best food in the world, so we'll wait for you.

 

Michelle:       What do you want consumers to know about you, about the food supply chain?

 

Massimo:       As I said before, our business, our activity, has been considered as essential. I think that, really, they gave us the awareness of how important we are for the entire supply chain. We are important because we are preparing the food for the Italians. I say Italians because we are based in Italy, but it's the same for the industry working in the same sector in other countries. We were allowed to work because it was important to bring the food to the people staying home.

 

                        I remember, I served in the U.S. a few years ago on a farm, on a big farm, and we had shirts, and it was written on this shirt, "Our family is proud to feed your family." It is really important that our work or our job is to feed people. We are open to the people. We want to be transparent with people so that they know what we do and how we do it. It's really important. We invested, in the last year, a lot of money in animal welfare because we believe that better welfare breeds better animals and shows better results. As I said before, to work together with the supply chain, with all the players of our supply chain, is the only way, I think, we can really face the worst.

 

Michelle:       I want to go back to talk about empathy and a sense of family, a sense of community. Is there a stronger feeling now that we are all in this together, the agricultural supply chain, the consumers? Is there more of a connection now?

 

Massimo:       Well, a sense of family, I think, is, for us as Italians, at the top of our thoughts. We have seen in the last few weeks that everyone is facing the same problem, and probably the mistake we did (make) was to think, at the beginning, that the coronavirus was the Chinese (people's) problem; then we found it in Italy. Still, everyone thought to close Italy. Then, in a few days, we found it all over Europe, the U.S., South America, and all over the world, so we probably need to share more information. Sharing more information probably could have (been correlated to) less victims, so the method is, when we have difficulties like this, we need to face the difficulties together.

 

                        What we have seen in Italy is that we have a lot of volunteers helping families, helping other people living alone without having the possibility to go out or to go shopping. Really, what we noticed in the last few weeks is this kind of mutual help to other people, so at different levels — family level, private level, or at the highest level, between different countries. I think that we have to see all these things more in a community way.

 

Michelle:       Veronesi is a family company. Is that correct?

 

Massimo:       Yes, it is. It is. Still now, after 62 years, it's still a family company and was founded by Apollinare Veronesi, managed by the five sons after his death, and now we have the third generation in charge. Actually, the president is one representative of the third generation of Veronesis, but they're still now a family company. Yes, it is.

 

Michelle:       Alltech is also a family company, so we certainly have that in common. Mr. Massimo Zanin, thank you so much for joining us today. Stay safe. Stay well.

 

Massimo:       Thank you. Thank you so much, too.

 

Michelle:       For additional resources on COVID-19, visit alltech.com.

 

 

Click here for additional COVID-19 resources.

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Animal Nutrition Focus Areas
<>Article Type
<>Topics
<>Image Caption

Massimo Zanin believes that the only way for the agricultural sector to be able to face the worst is for everyone involved in the food supply chain to work together.

Saiba como o cromo pode auxiliar na melhoria do desempenho e qualidade da carne em suínos

Submitted by ebetioli on Thu, 05/28/2020 - 12:55

A carne suína é a proteína animal mais consumida no mundo, sendo esta rica em nutrientes. Em 2019 o Brasil atingiu recorde de exportação com o volume de 750,3 mil toneladas entre in natura (649,38 mil ton.) e processados atingindo um faturamento de US$ 1,597 bilhão1. Atualmente o país abriga três das dez maiores indústrias mundiais de processamento de carne, ocupando o 1⁰, 4⁰ e 8⁰ lugar2 no ranking global. Pensando em atender as exigências do mercado consumidor, adequando às normas do mercado externo e maximizando os benefícios econômicos, o foco das agroindústrias, atualmente, é trabalhar com linhagens selecionadas para produção de alta porcentagem de carne magra na carcaça, através de planos nutricionais específicos para promover a qualidade da carne, além da segurança alimentar.

A cadeia suinícola busca sempre maior produtividade e melhor qualidade da carne e, para isso, precisa de alternativas que possibilitem a produção de carcaças que apresentem maior rendimento de carne, sem, contudo, afetar o desempenho dos animais3.

Por isso, os cuidados com o animal começam ainda na fase de gestação, para que ao nascer tenha-se leitões viáveis, saudáveis e com peso inicial que permita que o mesmo se desenvolva para obter o máximo desempenho.

Nas fases de crescimento e terminação dos rebanhos suínos, os consideráveis gastos com alimentos têm motivado a busca de recursos nutricionais e de manejo que otimizem essa situação. Nesse contexto, existem vários procedimentos clássicos na literatura e até aplicados na prática, incluindo, entre outros, a restrição alimentar seguida pelo ganho compensatório4 e o uso de ractopamina5. Também são adotados outros aditivos modificadores do metabolismo animal que redirecionam os nutrientes, melhorando as taxas de crescimento muscular e modificando, consequentemente, a proporção de proteína em relação à gordura. Dentre os aditivos, destaca-se uso cromo levedura (CrL)6.

O uso de ractopamina está restrito em alguns países como União Europeia, China e Rússia. Por isso, no Brasil, o uso pode ser limitado em sistemas de produções e/ou fábricas de ração, quando os animais não são destinados à exportação. Por isso, uma opção é a adoção do cromo levedura, que potencializa a ação da insulina, aumenta a captação de glicose no músculo7, pode melhorar o desempenho do suíno e, ainda,  reduzir a espessura de gordura da carcaça8. Além disso, devido aos seus efeitos na utilização de nutrientes, o cromo poderia potencialmente intensificar os efeitos da suplementação de ácido linoleico conjugado (CLA) e ractopamina e, ainda na ausência desta, apresentar resultados até melhores.

Um estudo9 analisou a interação entre ractopamina e cromo levedura quando combinados. Foi observado que 20 ppm de ractopamina e 400 ppb de levedura de cromo proveram  aumentos significativos na área de olho de lombo e no rendimento de carcaça, sugerindo a existência de um efeito sinérgico que pode estar relacionado à capacidade do cromo levedura em  melhorar a utilização de nutrientes em suínos alimentados com ractopamina.

Também foram observadas10 interações entre ractopamina e cromo levedura, o que proporcionou melhores resultados no desempenho dos suínos.

Outros trabalhos relatam também efeitos significativos do uso de cromo para ganho de peso, aumento da deposição muscular e redução da quantidade de gordura na carcaça e espessura de toucinho11, efeito significativo na oxidação lipídica12, na qualidade de carne a melhora na retenção de água,  no marmoreio13  e influência positiva na área de olho de lombo.

Outros estudos14 observaram redução na concentração de glicose no sangue e aumento do uso na energia das rações em suínos em crescimento. Também já houve uma pesquisa15 que observou que a inclusão de cromo reduziu a espessura de toucinho, além de aumentar a área de olho de lombo e a porcentagem de tecido muscular. Em um estudo16 de 2001, foram relatados que índices de qualidade de carcaça como a relação de carne magra, taxa de gordura, espessura de toucinho, e área de olho de lombo foram melhorados com a suplementação de cromo.

No mercado, onde a procura por alimentos saudáveis e acessíveis se faz cada vez maior, é imprescindível alinhar genética e nutrição contando com a utilização de aditivos que promovam melhoria no desempenho e qualidade da carne como o uso de cromo levedura. Devido ao fato da restrição do uso de ractopamina, nos mercados vemos então o cromo levedura como uma alternativa  viável, uma vez que não há restrições quanto ao seu uso nos mercados.

1 Associação Brasileira de Proteína Animal
2 USDA 2017; WTEx, 2017
3 Peres et al., 2014
4 Purslow et al., 2012
5 Bridi et 2006; Agostini et al., 2011
6 Baffa et.al.,2014
7 Evans e Bowman, 1992
8 NRC, 2012
9 Marcolla et.al., 2017
10 Baffa et. al., 2014
11 Lindemann et. al., 1995; Mooney, Crowell, 1995; Mooney, Crowell, 1999; Gomes et. al., 2005; Jacela et. al., 2009, Pamei et. al., 2014
12 Perez et. al., 2006
13 Matthews et. al., 2003; Shelton et. al., 2003
14 Lien et. al., 2001; Pamei et. al., 2014. Oliveira et. al.,
15 Page et al., 1993
16 Xi et al., 2001


Dúvidas ou comentários? Entre em contato conosco: 

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
Saiba como o cromo pode auxiliar na melhoria do desempenho e qualidade da carne em suínos
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Hubspot
<!--[if lte IE 8]>
<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2-legacy.js"></script>
<![endif]-->
<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//js.hsforms.net/forms/v2.js"></script>
<script>
hbspt.forms.create({
portalId: "745395",
formId: "d5a95c47-8fbb-4830-bd60-6043a3dd37e0"
});
</script>
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Animal Nutrition Focus Areas
<>Article Type
<>Challenges
<>Regions
<>Topics
<>Programs and Services

Влияние препарата Актиген на зоотехнические показатели

Submitted by eivantsova on Thu, 05/28/2020 - 04:52

Достижения в области нутригеномики способствуют получению высоких результатов на фермах.

Препарат Актигентм разработан специалистами компании Аlltech на основе достижений нутригеномики (Collett et al., 2011).

Актигентм представляет собой маннанобогащенную фракцию (МОФ). МОФ — это специфические углеводы, выделенные из наружного слоя клеточной стенки дрожжей Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sara et al., 2012).

Применение препарата Актигентм при выращивании бройлеров позволяет улучшить такие показатели, как конверсия корма, прирост живой массы, убойный выход тушки и ее качество (Piray et al., 2007). Использование препарата Актигентм способствует усилению иммунного ответа птицы и повышению ее сохранности (Panda et al., 2005).

Полный текст статьи

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Article Type

Boj se stresovými faktory prostředí u plodin

Submitted by kslampova on Thu, 05/28/2020 - 04:17

V seznamu faktorů, které ovlivňují produkci plodin, figuruje na prvním místě vliv prostředí. Pozitivní přínosy i negativní stresory vyvolané prostředím ovlivňují nejen růst rostlin a skutečný výnos při sklizni, hrají však také zásadní roli v tom, zda rostlina maximálně naplní svůj genetický potenciál.

Déšť, chlad, horko a dokonce i vítr – z týchž meteorologických faktorů, které podporují růst rostlin, se může stát nebezpečná hrozba. Pokud se uplatní v nadměrné míře, způsobují škody a zkázu. Environmentální stres může snižovat produktivitu plodin a jejich celkovou produkci, což vede k ekonomické nestabilitě zemědělců. Jednou ze zbraní, kterou lze bojovat proti nežádoucímu vlivu meteorologických faktorů, je biotechnologie.

Je důležité, aby půda a plodiny měly dostatek živin, a to dokonce ještě před sadbou. Poskytujeme-li rostlině již v nejranějších fázích života a také v průběhu celého pěstebního cyklu vyváženou výživu, může to plodině pomoci čelit situacím, které jsou z hlediska prostředí stresující. Biostimulanty mohou jako signální molekuly ovlivnit fyziologii rostliny a podporovat její růst, zvyšovat úspěšnost uchycení a optimalizovat zvětšování plodů či zrn. Biostimulanty také pomáhají rostlinám bojovat s jedním nejvýznamnějších problémů v oblasti zemědělství, což jsou abiotické stresy, jako je sucho nebo zasolení půdy. Tyto biostimulační technologie se používají k podpoře růstu kořenů rostlin, což zlepšuje jejich vývoj a produktivitu.

Sortiment řešení pro zlepšování půdy a výnosů s názvem Alltech Crop Science (ACS) využívá biotechnologii k podpoře kořenového systému rostlin, zajišťování jejich vyvážené výživy a zvyšování výnosů. Produkty Alltech Crop Science jsou nutričně vyvážené a doplněné vysoce kvalitními aminokyselinami. Umožňují rychlou absorpci a vyšší translokaci živin v rostlinách, čímž zvyšují jejich kvalitu a produktivitu.

Terénní studie, která byla nedávno provedena v USA na dvou kontrolních a dvou samostatně ošetřovaných plochách osazených sladkou kukuřicí, prokázala účinky ACS na kořenový systém a vývoj rostlin a také na zdravé půdní prostředí. V rámci této studie byl na ošetřovaná pole při sadbě aplikován produkt Soil-Set® AID, což vedlo k vyššímu počátečnímu přírůstku během prvního týdne v porovnání se dvěma kontrolními plochami. Tatáž pole byla později ošetřena produktem Impro-Grain®. „Ošetřené rostliny vykazovaly uniformní velikost a byly větší než rostliny pěstované na kontrolních plochách,“ říká Brian Springer, technický ředitel prodeje Alltech Crop Science, který se na terénní studii podílel. „Na polích ošetřených ACS vzešlo 100 % rostlin, zatímco na jedné z kontrolních ploch to bylo pouze 67 %. Tento trend jsme pozorovali v průběhu celé studie,“ dodává Springer.

Brzy nastalo sucho, když 10 dnů nepršelo a tepoty dosahovaly 37 °C. V těchto nepříznivých podmínkách rostliny ošetřené ACS jednoznačně obstály. „Ošetřené rostliny se po zátěži způsobené suchem vzpamatovaly a vytvářely klasy,“ říká Springer. „Zjistili jsme také, že kořenové systémy ošetřených rostlin byly významně větší než u kontrolních rostlin, což vedlo k vyššímu výnosu v porovnání s kontrolními plochami.“

Podíváme-li se na opačný konec spektra, je zřejmé, že zimní deště a sněžení zajišťují dostatečnou vlhkost půdy, která je nutná pro přípravu další sezóny. Změny klimatu však dnes ovlivňují zemědělské cykly a podmínky a zemědělci se často potýkají s tím, že půda je v době sadby prochladlá. Rostliny pak potřebují více času a energie, aby vzešly. „Poškození rostlin v důsledku těchto stresových faktorů může vést k tomu, že rostliny vzcházejí později a vykazují známky opožděného vývoje. Dokonce může dojít k úplné ztrátě plodin na mnoha hektarech,“ vysvětlujte Nicolas Body, technický ředitel Alltech Crop Science pro Evropu. „Soil-Set AID zlepšuje mikrobiologické parametry půdy a posiluje dobře strukturovaný kořenový systém rostlin, které tak mohou lépe odolávat uvedeným stresovým situacím a překonávat je.“

Reakce na stres se může pohybovat od mírně zaschlých listů až po odumřelou rostlinnou tkáň pod zemí i na povrchu. „Rostlina tak čelí dlouhodobému environmentálnímu stresu a v počátečních fázích hůře roste, což ovlivňuje její velikost a potenciál, co se týká produktivity“, pokračuje Body. Pro tyto situace doporučuje technický ředitel Alltech Crop Science přípravek Impro-Grain®, který rostliny stimuluje, pomáhá jim udržet si normální tempo růstu a celkově je podporuje v období stresu.

„Impro-Grain® aplikovaný na řepku olejku na konci fáze uchycení rostlin nebo na ozimé obiloviny (např. pšenici) na konci zimy může rostlinám pomoci odolat nepříznivému počasí a klimatickému stresu,“ vysvětluje Body. „V těchto stádiích jsou listy malé a křehké a rostlina vynakládá velké množství energie na to, aby se zotavila z poškození v důsledku vlivu prostředí. Technologie, na níž je založeno složení tohoto produktu, pomáhá rostlinám právě v těchto stresových obdobích.“

Obiloviny a zrniny jsou agronomickým segmentem, kde by měly biostimulanty podle prognóz získat největší podílu na trhu, a to kvůli vyšší poptávce po biologických hnojivech a zákazům škodlivých chemikálií, které se používají jako vstupy zemědělské produkce. „Je to nová hranice,“ prohlašuje Body. „Má-li zdravá rostlina potenciál udržet si dobré zdraví, biostimulanty mohou tuto její schopnost podpořit tím, že stimulují její vlastní kapacitu reagovat biochemicky na stresové faktory.“

Body také poukazuje na další dvě hlavní výhody častějšího používání této technologie. „Používání biostimulantů ve větší míře na celém světě může zlepšit stav chemicky ošetřované půdy a souvisejících vodních zdrojů. Aplikace biostimulantů sníží objem použitých pesticidů a zvýší účinnost využití živin, například dusíku,“ podotýká Body.

Pěstitelé dnes volí přirozenější způsoby řízení produkce s cílem dosáhnout trvalejší udržitelnosti svého podnikání. Zdravější půda a zdravější rostliny znamenají vyšší produktivitu, kvůli níž se technologie na přírodní bázi a investice do nich bohatě vyplatí.

<>Premium Content
Off
<>Featured Image
<>Date
<>Featured Image License
Off
<>Feature
Off
<>Primary Focus Area
<>Article Type
Loading...